Systematic review of controlled trials on erythropoietin to support evidence-based guidelines.

نویسندگان

  • Jerome Seidenfeld
  • Margaret Piper
  • Naomi Aronson
چکیده

To support evidence-based clinical guidelines on erythropoietin use for anemia in oncology, we conducted systematic reviews of controlled trials on four patient groups. These were patients with treatment-related anemia; patients with disease-related anemia; patients transplanted with allogeneic hematopoietic stem cells; and those transplanted with autologous hematopoietic stem cells. Two reviewers followed a prospective protocol to select studies, abstract relevant outcomes, evaluate study quality, and conduct meta-analysis where data sufficed. For treatment-related anemia, meta-analysis of available evidence (22 trials; N = 1,927) demonstrated reduced odds of transfusion after erythropoietin, but higher-quality trials reported smaller odds reductions. In several trials, erythropoietin improved quality of life for groups with mean baseline hemoglobin < or = 10 g/dL. However, evidence was insufficient to determine whether initiating erythropoietin treatment earlier for newly anemic patients reduced the odds of transfusion or improved quality of life more than waiting until hemoglobin approached l0 g/dL. Limited evidence (6 trials; N= 693) suggested that erythropoietin decreased the risk of transfusion for patients with disease-related anemia. For those undergoing allotransplants, evidence (7 trials; N = 493) showed erythropoietin modestly decreased time to red cell engraftment and transfusions. Studies on erythropoietin after autologous transplants (6 trials; N = 321) did not support a beneficial effect of erythropoietin.

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

راهنمای بالینی درمان مبتنی بر شواهد: ویتیلیگو

Clinical practice guidelines are the most important and valid guidelines for treatment of diseases, and are developed through experts consensus on a subject, considering the highest available evidence (systematic reviews, metaanalyses, and randomized controlled trials). We briefly review the latest evidence-based guideline for the treatment of vitiligo provided by European Dermatology Forum.

متن کامل

Evaluating the effectiveness of peer-based intervention in managing type I diabetes mellitus among children and adolescents: A systematic review

Background: Type 1 diabetes is one of the chronic metabolic disorders among children and adolescents. Peers are also important units in diabetes management through adolescence. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of peer-based intervention in managing type 1 diabetes mellitus among children and adolescents. &nbsp; Methods: Searching articles published prior to December 2013 in Pub...

متن کامل

Effects of Acupuncture on Anxiety in Infertile Women: A Systematic Review of the Literature

Background & aim: Stress and anxiety due to waiting for treatment results and uncertainty of treatment success are common problems in infertile women. Acupuncture has been suggested as an effective strategy to relieve anxiety. This study aimed to review the available evidence on the effects of acupuncture on anxiety in infertile women. Methods: This systematic review was conducted via searching...

متن کامل

Effectiveness of Support Resources for Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: A Systematic Review of Clinical Trials in Iran

Introduction and Objectives: Type 2 diabetes is a common metabolic disorder worldwide. Health policymakers face challenges in the management of this chronic disease. According to previous studies, due to the complex nature of diabetes, the use of support resources can be effective in improving disease management. The current study aimed to identify the sources of support for patients with type ...

متن کامل

Evaluation of Clinical Trials

In a number of important clinical issues such as evaluation of the efficacy or effectiveness of therapeutic or preventive interventions as well as for comparing the harms of interventions, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) provide the highest levels of evidence, either directly or indirectly. It is obvious that critical appraisal of these studies to assess their validity and precision is of p...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • Oncology

دوره 16 9 Suppl 10  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2002